The winner of Month May 2006 - SITE OF THE MONTH - BLOG

SITE OF THE MONTH : The winner of Month May 2006

Posted by michael on 2009/4/3 17:00:00 (1980 reads)

The winner of our "XOOPS Site of the month contest" for month MAY 2006 with 38% of all valid votes is .... VETOFISH.

Some comments to vetofish given by our visitors:

+ I like it's originality, the way how it manages content and all it's features.

+ What do YOU love most of YOUR favourite Site? This was a tough choice but I have to say my reason for choosing Vetofish was because of it's graphics. I like the layout but the style of the design makes me feel as if I'm using a local program. Simple yet effective.

+ The design is polished and pleasing to the eye. It doesn't look like, yet another XOOPS site. Well done!

VETOFISH

TS online is the first runner up with 28% of all votes.

With 17% of all votes on the third place: 2TonGorilla

Congratulation to all who took part in this contest, and of course, to the winner and runner ups. Keep on good work!

(This entry was posted on Monday, June 26th, 2006 at 8:00 pm)

Rating: 0.00 (0 votes) - Rate this News -

Tags:

site-of-the-month

XOOPS-Sites

Previous article - Next article

Other articles
2009/10/27 19:51:15 - XOOPS 2.4.0 FINAL Is Released
2009/4/29 20:34:45 - xoops.org pagerank is gone ... why?
2009/4/29 18:48:22 - Xoops.org will be down on May 2nd
2009/4/3 17:50:00 - Zarilia and EXM join forces with XOOPS
2009/4/3 17:45:13 - I had a dream about XOOPS
2009/4/3 17:20:00 - Site of the Month October 2006 - the result
2009/4/3 17:20:00 - Site of the Month November 2006 - the result
2009/4/3 17:20:00 - the winner of xoops site of the month contest december 2006
2009/4/3 17:20:00 - The winner of month january 2007
2009/4/3 17:10:00 - The winner of Month June 2006
2009/4/3 17:10:00 - The winner of Month July 2006
2009/4/3 17:10:00 - xoops site of the month August 2006
2009/4/3 17:10:00 - site of the month september 2006
2009/4/3 17:00:00 - The winner of March 2006
2009/4/3 17:00:00 - the winner of Month April 2006

The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.